What happens when a town uses a puppet to create a rubber stamp solution?
It goes into Superior Court where real judges rule de novo. Check it out George.
Austin Shea (Arizona) 7th Street and Van Buren, L.L.C. v. City of Phoenix, 142 P.3d 693
414ZONING AND PLANNING
414X Judicial Review or Relief
414X(C) Scope of Review
414X(C)2 Additional Proofs and Trial De Novo
414k642 k. Trial de novo in general.
Ariz.App.Div.1,2006
On review of board of adjustment’s decision to rehear appeal from zoning administrator’s decision, the parties’ disagreement regarding the definition of manifest error, for purposes of municipal ordinance providing that an appeal may be reheard only when there has been a manifest error affecting the board’s action, presented a question of law that Court of Appeals would review de novo.Copr. (C) West 2008 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works
Pingitore v. Town of Cave Creek, 981 P.2d 129
Ariz.App.Div.1,1998
If there is credible evidence to support town board of adjustment’s decision, it must be affirmed; however, when the issues are ones of statutory interpretation, the board’s interpretation of the law is subject to de novo review.Copr. (C) West 2008 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works
Pingitore v. Town of Cave Creek, 981 P.2d 129
Ariz.App.Div.1,1998
Board of Adjustment USMC
For the first time in 8 years, the Sonoran News wrote what appears to be an unbiased article on events surrounding my property in Cave Creek. Thanks Linda.
Although George Ross and I agree to disagree, and my special action to Superior Court will appeal the Board’s decision on the variance, nonetheless, we can conduct ourselves with decorum and respect. I ran my first marathon at El Toro Marine Base and many of my business associates in San Diego were officers in the Marines. Perhaps Mr. Ross will be inclined to a small wager as to the review and outcome of his decision?